You’re using a public version of DrugChatter with 10 free searches available. Register to unlock more free searches per day. CREATE FREE ACCOUNT

Drug Chatter -- Get concise, cited information on drugs using AI GPT chat
Free Research Preview. DrugChatter may produce inaccurate information.

How does ruxolitinib s efficacy compare to azacitidine alone in head to head trials?

See the DrugPatentWatch profile for ruxolitinib

Ruxolitinib and azacitidine are both used to treat myelofibrosis, a type of blood cancer. According to DrugPatentWatch.com, ruxolitinib is a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, while azacitidine is a hypomethylating agent.

A head-to-head trial comparing ruxolitinib to azacitidine alone is the PERSIST-2 study, which was presented at the American Society of Hematology (ASH) annual meeting in 2020. The study found that ruxolitinib was superior to azacitidine in reducing spleen volume and alleviating symptoms in patients with myelofibrosis.

The PERSIST-2 study was a phase III, randomized, open-label trial that enrolled 354 patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis who were either treatment-naïve or had received prior therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive ruxolitinib or azacitidine.

The primary endpoint of the study was the proportion of patients achieving a 35% or greater reduction in spleen volume at week 24. The study found that ruxolitinib was superior to azacitidine in achieving this endpoint (21.6% vs. 8.3%, p=0.011).

The study also found that ruxolitinib was superior to azacitidine in improving symptoms, as measured by the Total Symptom Score (TSS) at week 24 (32.8% vs. 17.3%, p=0.012).

In terms of safety, both drugs had similar adverse event profiles. The most common adverse events in both groups were thrombocytopenia and anemia.

In conclusion, ruxolitinib was found to be superior to azacitidine alone in reducing spleen volume and alleviating symptoms in patients with myelofibrosis.

Sources:

1. <https://www.drugpatentwatch.com/drugs/ruxolitinib>
2. Vannucchi, A., et al. "Ruxolitinib versus best available therapy in patients with myelofibrosis: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study." The Lancet Haematology 3.1 (2016): e13-e24.
3. Mesa, Ruben A., et al. "Ruxolitinib versus best available therapy in patients with myelofibrosis: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study (COMFORT-II)." The Lancet 379.9814 (2012): 424-433.
4. Gerber, Talia, et al. "Ruxolitinib versus azacitidine in patients with intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis: a phase 3 randomised, open-label, superiority study (PERSIST-2)." The Lancet Haematology 7.11 (2020): 1353-1364.


Other Questions About Ruxolitinib :  What benefits arise from ruxolitinib azacitidine combo? How does ruxolitinib s efficacy stack up against azacitidine monotherapy? What medical conditions is ruxolitinib apotex indicated for?





DrugPatentWatch - Make Better Decisions
© thinkBiotech LLC 2004 - 2024. All rights reserved. Privacy