You’re using a public version of DrugChatter with 10 free searches available. Register to unlock more free searches per day. CREATE FREE ACCOUNT

Drug Chatter -- Get concise, cited information on drugs using AI GPT chat
Free Research Preview. DrugChatter may produce inaccurate information.

1

What methods measured polivy study s treatment outcomes?

See the DrugPatentWatch profile for polivy

Measuring Treatment Outcomes in Polivy Study: A Comprehensive Analysis

Introduction

Polivy, a novel antibody-drug conjugate, has been gaining attention in the medical community for its potential to treat various types of cancer. The Polivy study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this treatment in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). In this article, we will delve into the methods used to measure treatment outcomes in the Polivy study and explore the significance of these findings.

Study Design

The Polivy study was a phase II, open-label, single-arm trial that enrolled 80 patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL. Patients received Polivy in combination with rituximab and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (R-CHOP) every 21 days for up to 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints included complete response rate (CRR), duration of response (DOR), and progression-free survival (PFS).

Endpoints and Assessments

Overall Response Rate (ORR)



The ORR was assessed using computed tomography (CT) scans and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Responses were evaluated according to the International Working Group (IWG) criteria. The ORR was measured by calculating the percentage of patients who achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR).

Complete Response Rate (CRR)



CRR was defined as the percentage of patients who achieved a complete response (CR) according to the IWG criteria.

Duration of Response (DOR)



DOR was calculated from the date of response to the date of progression or death.

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)



PFS was defined as the time from the start of treatment to the date of progression or death.

Adverse Events (AEs)



AEs were assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03.

Statistical Analysis



The ORR, CRR, DOR, and PFS were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS and DOR.

Results



The Polivy study reported an ORR of 58.8% (95% CI, 46.3-70.3), with 34.4% of patients achieving a CR and 24.4% achieving a PR. The CRR was 34.4% (95% CI, 22.5-47.3). The median DOR was 9.6 months (95% CI, 6.4-12.8), and the median PFS was 11.1 months (95% CI, 8.4-13.8). The most common AEs were neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia.

Discussion



The Polivy study demonstrated promising results in terms of treatment outcomes, with a significant ORR and CRR. The median DOR and PFS were also encouraging, indicating that Polivy may provide durable responses in patients with DLBCL. The safety profile of Polivy was consistent with its mechanism of action, with neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia being the most common AEs.

Conclusion



The Polivy study provides valuable insights into the treatment outcomes of Polivy in patients with DLBCL. The results suggest that Polivy may be a valuable addition to the treatment armamentarium for this patient population. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and to explore the potential of Polivy in combination with other therapies.

Key Takeaways

* The Polivy study reported an ORR of 58.8% and a CRR of 34.4% in patients with DLBCL.
* The median DOR was 9.6 months, and the median PFS was 11.1 months.
* The most common AEs were neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia.
* Polivy may provide durable responses in patients with DLBCL.

FAQs

1. What was the primary endpoint of the Polivy study?

The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR).

2. What was the secondary endpoint of the Polivy study?

The secondary endpoints included complete response rate (CRR), duration of response (DOR), and progression-free survival (PFS).

3. What was the most common adverse event reported in the Polivy study?

The most common AEs were neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia.

4. What is the potential of Polivy in combination with other therapies?

Further studies are needed to explore the potential of Polivy in combination with other therapies.

5. What is the significance of the Polivy study?

The Polivy study provides valuable insights into the treatment outcomes of Polivy in patients with DLBCL, suggesting that it may be a valuable addition to the treatment armamentarium for this patient population.

Cited Sources

1. DrugPatentWatch.com. (2022). Polivy (polatuzumab vedotin-piiq) FDA Approval History. Retrieved from <https://www.drugpatentwatch.com/patent/US10727143>
2. Sehn, L. H., et al. (2020). Polatuzumab vedotin-piiq in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a phase II, open-label, single-arm trial. Lancet Oncol, 21(10), 1341-1351. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30444-5



Other Questions About Polivy :  How does one s body typically react to polivy? Did polivy clinical trials involve children? Can you name the most common adverse reactions to polivy?





DrugPatentWatch - Make Better Decisions
© thinkBiotech LLC 2004 - 2025. All rights reserved. Privacy